The Bangladesh Cricket Board has barred former national cricketer Monjurul Islam from all forms of cricket-related involvement under its jurisdiction after an Independent Inquiry Committee found prima facie evidence of inappropriate conduct in two of four allegations filed by former captain Jahanara Alam. The decision was taken at a board meeting held at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium on Sunday. The committee, formed to investigate a complaint of sexual assault during the 2022 Women’s World Cup, reviewed four allegations. Two claims were not substantiated due to insufficient evidence, while two were found to contain prima facie evidence of inappropriate behaviour. Confirming the allegation, the board stated that, “Based on the findings of the Independent Inquiry Committee formed by the BCB to examine the complaint lodged by former Bangladesh Women’s National Team Captain Jahanara Alam, the Board has decided to impose a ban on former national cricketer Monjurul Islam from all forms of direct or indirect employment and/or cricket-related activities under the jurisdiction of the Bangladesh Cricket Board." Read also: MS Dhoni Set for IPL 2026 Return with CSK Committee Findings and Contractual Context Monjurul had served as selector and manager of the Bangladesh women’s team. His contractual term with the board concluded on June 30, 2025. The committee determined that aspects of his conduct were inconsistent with professional standards and classified certain actions as misconduct and harassment under relevant Supreme Court guidelines. “In view of the report of the Independent Inquiry Committee, the Board has engaged its Legal Team to address the findings in line with the BCB’s zero-tolerance policy on harassment and misconduct," the BCB said in a statement on February 3, adding that it was committed to taking appropriate measures in accordance with its regulations and the law. It further added, “The BCB is reviewing the recommendations of the Committee and will take any additional measures deemed necessary in light of the report." Complainant Response and Transparency Concerns Alam’s legal representatives later described the outcome as “not fully satisfactory.” While acknowledging that the inquiry process had concluded, they stated she had not been formally informed of the detailed findings and had not received a copy of the report or relevant portions of it. The board confirmed that two allegations were unsubstantiated and two involved prima facie evidence but did not publicly identify which specific claims were upheld. After seeking clarification by email, Alam was informed that a media release was standard procedure and that the legal team was reviewing the report prior to any lawful disclosure. Alam has maintained that proceedings involving allegations of this seriousness must be “transparent, fair and victim-centric," and has requested formal communication of findings, access to relevant documentation, and clarity on further action.